Check out tefl tesol about TESOL Tolyatti and apply today to be certified to teach English abroad.
You could also be interested in:
This is how our TEFL graduates feel they have gained from their course, and how they plan to put into action what they learned:
This unit (finally) covered modal verbs in a systematic way, the passive voice, relative clauses, and phrasal verbs. While the passive voice made regular appearances in my own schooling , this was my first time learning about modal and phrasal verbs. The chart listing modal verbs alongside the different uses of each was helpful, but I feel incomplete. For example, in American English \"may\" can also be used for prohibition (negative only) just like \"must\"; similarly \"have/has (got) to\" can also be used for things the speaker is assuming are necessary or certain (\"I put my keys on the counter last night, so they have to be here.\"), much in the same way \"must\" can be. I have similar feelings about the examples of phrasal verbs provided: in American English, both [\"take on\" + object] and [\"take\" + object + \"on\"] can be used to express opposing something. There are many contemporary examples of this usage in politics: talk about \"taking on Big Pharma\", or \"take on corruption\" are just a couple of these. I think it would be helpful if there were a note indicating that these differences exist, perhaps explaining some of the more egregious instances of these variations, indicating whether or not there are times in which using one form or another would be appropriate, or explaining why one form is more correct than another.
